Structure
Do expected fields exist, and are types and formats valid?
Data is easier to trust when teams can check important assumptions and trace how a result was produced.
Not every table needs the same checks. Focus first on the failures that would change a decision or break a downstream workflow.
Do expected fields exist, and are types and formats valid?
Are required values present within the expected range?
Do keys, joins, and references match the rules of the model?
Do business definitions and metric assumptions still hold?
Lineage shows how datasets and transformations depend on each other. It can help answer: where did a metric come from, what changed upstream, and which reports might be affected?
Lineage is most useful when metadata stays connected to the actual pipeline runs and model definitions. A diagram without updated ownership or definitions can create false confidence.
Explore architecture notes →Original records and schema versions.
Typed fields and reusable definitions.
Documented time window and rule.
Decision context and access owner.
Maintains business definitions, sensitivity labels, and expected use.
Owns freshness, transformation logic, retries, and alert routing.
Knows how to interpret the data and report mismatches.